On the Threshold of a Conflict Between the East and the West. Herodotus’ Stories of Asians’ Attempts to Involve Sparta in War with the Persian Empire
Dostoevsky Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities
For citation: Sinitsyn, Alexander A. On the Threshold of a Conflict Between the East and the West. Herodotus’ Stories of Asians’ Attempts to Involve Sparta in War with the Persian Empire // Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy (The Earliest States of Eastern Europe). 2025: Ways and Means of Conflict Resolution / Editor of the volume Т.N. Jackson. Мoscow: GAUGN-Press, 2025. S. 1–1.
DOI: 10.32608/1560-1382-2025-46-1-1
Abstract: Before the Greek-Persian wars, the Ionians had tried to engage the Hellenic states of the Balkan Greece in the flaring advance of a group of poleis in Asia Minor against the Persian rule, the Ionic revolt resulted in a large-scale (within the ancient world) conflict between the East and the West and unleashed a half-century’s confrontation between the Hellenes and the Achaemenid Empire. Aware of the ‘enormity’ of the Persian wars in the world history, Herodotus chose a topic of a Homeric scale to be accounted of epically. His historical and ethnographic text is made up of various myths, yarns, legends, anecdotes and amusing and edifying short stories. This article dwells on the well-known episode from Herodotus’ Histories about the bronze tablet that Aristagoras, the tyrant of Miletus, had brought from Ionia to Sparta to show to King Cleomenes (Herod. 5. 49). Aristagoras sought to engage the Spartans in a conflict with Persians by using this peculiar πίναξ which was an archaic geographic proto-map meant to persuade Cleomenes to set out on a dangerous military march. The map on the χάλκεος πίναξ showed the proximity to the lands that the Spartans were to reach together with the rebellious Ionians. Yet the King rejected the request and asked to indicate precisely the distance. Herodotus takes an ironic stand on the Ionic petitioner: if Aristagoras did count on engaging the Spartans, he should have concealed the actual state of affairs and tried to achieve the desired effect by using his deceptive ‘map’. According to the author of the article, the novella of Aristagoras’ mission in Sparta and the bronze tablet is presented in the Histories as a drama: with dialogues, urgings, attempts made by the protagonist (the tyrant of Miletus) to get King Cleomenes interested and win him over, yet Aristagoras’ designs failed. The moral of Herodotus’ parable about Aristagoras, Cleomenes, his daughter Gorgo and the ‘geographical map’ can be interpreted as follows: beware of the Ionians bringing fake tablets. But in Athens everything turned out differently. There Aristagoras’ mission was successful. Athenians sent Ionians 20 ships, which, as Herodotus writes in Homer’s language, became ‘the beginning of the disasters’ (ἀρχὴ κακῶν) of all Hellenes and barbarians (Herod. 5. 97. 3) – the beginning of a great conflict between Europe and Asia.
References
Борухович В.Г. Научное и литературное значение труда Геродота // Геродот. История / Пер. и примеч. Г.А. Стратановского. М., 2002. C. 585–623. [Borukhovich V.G. Nauchnoe i literaturnoe znachenie truda Gerodota (The Scientific and Literary Significance of Herodotus’ Work) // Gerodot. Istoriya / Per. i primech. G.A. Stratanovskogo. Moscow, 2002. S. 585–623.]
Борухович В.Г. Афины и Персия в период Ионийского восстания 500 г. до н. э. / Подгот. к изд. и комм. А.А. Синицына // В.Г. Борухович в воспоминаниях и письмах / Сост. текста, вступ. ст. В.Н Парфенова. Саратов, 2009. С. 201–218. [Borukhovich V.G. Afiny i Persiya v period Ioniyskogo vosstaniya 500 g. do n.e. (Athens and Persia during the Ionian revolt of 500 BC) / Podgot. k izd. i komm. A.A. Sinitsyn // V.G. Borukhovich v vospominaniyakh i pis’makh / Sost. teksta, vstup. stat’ya V.N. Parfenova. Saratov, 2009. S. 201–218.]
Геродот. История в девяти книгах / Пер. с предисл. Ф.Г. Мищенко. Изд. 2-е, испр., добавл. М., 1888. [Gerodot. Istoriya v devyati knigakh (Histories in Nine Books) / Per. s predisl. F.G. Mishchenko. Izd. 2, ispr., dobavl. Moscow, 1888.]
Геродот. История / Пер. и примеч. Г.А. Стратановского. М., 2002. [Gerodot. Istoriya (Histories) / Per. i primech. G.A. Stratanovskogo. Moscow, 2002.]
Печатнова Л.Г. Античное предание о гибели спартанского царя Клеомена I // АМА. 2006. Вып. 12. С. 52–65. [Pechatnova L.G. Antichnoe predanie o gibeli spartanskogo tsarya Kleomena I (The Ancient Tradition about Spartan King Kleomenes I’ Death) // Antichnyy mir i arkheologiya. Vol. 12. S. 52–65.]
Печатнова Л.Г. Спартанские цари. М., 2007. [Pechatnova L.G. Spartanskie tsari (Spartan Kings). Moscow, 2007.]
Синицын А.А. Геродот, Софокл и египетские диковинки (Об одном историографическом мифе) // АМА. 2006. Вып. 12. С. 363–405. [Sinitsyn А.А. Gerodot, Sofokl i egipetskie dikovinki (Ob odnom istoriograficheskom mife) (Herodotus, Sophocles and Egyptian Curiosities (On one Historiographic Myth) // Antichnyy mir i arkheologiya. 2006. Vol. 12. S. 363–405.]
Синицын А.А. В августе 424-го. Ускоренным маршем от Истма до Македонии (историко-географический аспект фракийского похода Брасида). Часть I // АМА. 2009. Вып. 13. С. 36–69. [Sinitsyn А.А. V аvguste 424-gо. Uskorennym marshem ot Istma do Makedonii (istoriko-gеоgraficheskiy аspekt frakiyskogo pokhoda Brasida). Ch. I (In August 424. By an Accelerated March from the Isthmus to Macedonia (Historical and Geographical Aspect of the Thracian Campaign of Brasidas). Part I) // Antichnyy mir i arkheologiya. 2009. Vol. 13. S. 36–69.]
Синицын А.А. Канаты и мосты греко-персидской войны // Iranica: Иранские империи и греко-римский мир в VI в. до н. э. – VI в. н. э. / Под ред. О.Л. Габелко, Э.В. Рунга, А.А. Синицына, Е.В. Смыкова. Казань, 2017. С. 137–171. [Sinitsyn A.A. Kanaty i mosty Greko-persidskoy voyny (Ropes and Bridges of the Persian War) // Iranica: Iranskie imperii i greko-rimskiy mir v VI v. do n. e. – VI v. n. e. / Pod red. O.L. Gabelko, E.V. Runga, A.A. Sinitsyna, E.V. Smykova. Kazan, 2017. S. 137–171.] (а)
Синицын А.А. Замечания к истории «Тройственного союза»: Пердикка II, Брасид и полисы Халкидики во Фракийской кампании // АМА. 2017. Вып. 18. С. 37–69. [Sinitsyn A.A. Zamechaniya k istorii “Troystvennogo soyuza”: Perdikka II, Brasid i polisy Khalkidiki vo Frakiyskoy kampanii (Notes on the History of the ‘Triple Alliance’: Perdiccas II, Brasidas and the Khalcidian Poleis in the Thracian Campaign) // Antichnyy mir i arkheologiya. 2017. Vol. 18. S. 37–69.] (б)
Синицын А.А., Суриков И.Е. Новый коллективный труд об «отце истории» как ученом и рассказчике // Мнемон. Исследования и публикации по истории античного мира. 2019. Вып. 19. 1. С. 183–216. [Sinitsyn А.А., Surikov I.E. Novyy kollektivnyy trud ob «ottse istorii» kak uchenom i rasskazchike (A New Collective Work on the “Father of History” as a Scholar and Narrator) // Mnemon: Issledovaniya i publikatsii po istorii antichnogo mira. 2019. Iss. 19. № 1. S. 183–216.]
Суриков И.Е. Античная Греция. Политики в контексте эпохи. Архаика и ранняя классика. М., 2005. [Surikov I.E. Antichnaya Gretsiya. Politiki v kontekste epokhi. Arkhaika i rannyaya klassika (Ancient Greece. Politics in the Context of the Era. Archaic and Early Classics). Moscow, 2005.]
Суриков И.Е. «Праотцы истории». Древнейшие представители античной исторической науки. Т. 1: Общие вопросы. СПб., 2024. [Surikov I.E. “Praotsy istorii”. Drevneyshie predstaviteli antichnoy istoricheskoy nauki. T. 1: Obshchie voprosy (“The Forefathers of History”. The Most Ancient Representatives of Ancient Historical Science. Vol. 1: General problems). St. Petersburg, 2024.]
Armayor O.K. Herodotus, Hecataeus and the Persian Wars // The World of Herodotus. Proceedings of an International Conference. Nicosia, September 18–21, 2003 / Ed. by V. Karageorghis, I. Taifacos. Nicosia, 2004. P. 321–335.
Asheri D. Book III // Asheri D., Lloyd A., Corcella A. A Commentary on Herodotus Books I–IV / Ed. by O. Murray, A. Moreno, with a Contribution by M. Brosius; Trans. by B. Graziosi et al. Oxford, 2007. P. 379–527.
Atack C. “By Zeus”, Said Theodote: Women as Interlocutors and Performers in Xenophon’s Philosophical Writings // The Routledge Handbook of Women and Ancient Greek Philosophy / Ed. by S. Brill, C. McKeen. N.Y.; L., 2024. P. 118–134.
Baker O.R. Gorgo: Sparta’s Woman of Autonomy, Authority, and Agency // Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts. 2022. Vol. 9, Iss. 2. P. 145–158.
Bakker M. de. An Uneasy Smile: Herodotus on Maps and the Question of How to View the World // New Worlds out of Old Texts: Revisiting Ancient Space and Place / Ed. by E.T.E. Barker, S. Bouzarovski, C.B.R. Pelling, L. Isaksen. Oxford, 2016. P. 81–99.
Barker E.T.E. On Space, Place, and Form in Herodotus’ Histories // Histos. 2021. Vol. 15. P. 88–130.
Barker E.T.E., Pelling C.B.R. Space-Travelling in Herodotus 5 // New Worlds out of Old Texts: Revisiting Ancient Space and Place / Ed. by E.T.E. Barker, S. Bouzarovski, C.B.R. Pelling, L. Isaksen. Oxford, 2016. P. 225–252.
Baron C. Ionian Revolt // The Herodotus Encyclopedia / Ed. by C. Baron. Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ, 2021. P. 746–747.
Bertelli L. Hecataeus: From Genealogy to Historiography // The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus / Ed. by N. Luraghi. Oxford, 2001. P. 67–94.
Bichler R. Herodots Historien unter dem Aspekt der Raumerfassung // Wahrnehmung und Erfassung geographischer Räume in der Antike / Hrsg. von M. Rathmann. Mainz, 2007. S. 67–80.
Bichler R. Zur Veranschaulichung geographischen Wissen in Herodots Historien // Geographische Kenntnisse und ihre Konkreten Ausformungen. München, 2013. S. 74–89.
Bichler R. Herodotus the Geographer // Herodotus – Narrator, Scientist, Historian / Ed. by E. Bowie. B.; Boston, 2018. P. 139–155.
Blamire A. Herodotus and Histiaeus // CQ. N.S. 1959. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 142–154.
Bradford A.S. Gynaikokratoumenoi: Did Spartan Women Rule Spartan Men? // The Ancient World. 1986. Vol. 14. No. 1–2. P. 13–18.
Branscome D. Herodotus and the Map of Aristagoras // ClAnt. 2010. Vol. 29. Iss. 1. P. 1–44.
Branscome D. Textual Rivals: Self-Presentation in Herodotus’ Histories. Ann Arbor, 2013.
Branscome D. Cleomenes // The Herodotus Encyclopedia / Ed. by C. Baron. Hoboken, NJ, 2021. Vol. 1. P. 330–331. (a)
Branscome D. Gorgo // The Herodotus Encyclopedia / Ed. by C. Baron. Hoboken, NJ, 2021. Vol. 2. P. 625. (b)
Briant P. From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire / Trans. by P.T. Daniels. Winona Lake, IN, 2002.
Carey C. Homer and Epic in Herodotus’ Book 7 // Homeric Receptions Across Generic and Cultural Contexts / Ed. by A. Efstathiou, I. Karamanou. B.; Boston, 2016. P. 71–89.
Cawkwell G. The Greek Wars: The Failure of Persia. Oxford, 2005.
Cawkwell G. Cyrene to Chaeronea: Selected Essays on Ancient Greek History. Oxford; N.Y., 2011.
Ceccarelli P. Map, Catalogue, Drama, Narrative: Representations of the Aegean Space // New Worlds out of Old Texts: Revisiting Ancient Space and Place / Ed. by E.T.E. Barker, S. Bouzarovski, C.B.R. Pelling, L. Isaksen. Oxford, 2016. P. 61–80.
Chapman A. The Female Principle in Plutarch’s Moralia. Dublin, 2011.
Chapman G.A.R. Herodotus and Histiaeus’ Role in the Ionian Revolt // Historia. 1972. Bd. 22. H. 4. P. 546–568.
Clarke K. Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man and Nature in Herodotus’ Histories. Oxford, 2018.
Clarke K. Ignorance is Bliss? Geographical Knowledge in Herodotus and Thucydides // Histos. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 175–207.
Evans J.A.S. Histiaeus and Aristagoras: Notes on the Ionian Revolt // AJPh. 1963. Vol. 84. No. 2. P. 113–128.
Evans J.A.S. Herodotus and the Ionian Revolt // Historia. 1976. Bd. 25. H. 1. P. 31–37.
Figueira Th. Language as a Marker of Ethnicity in Herodotus and Contemporaries // Ethnicity and Identity in Herodotus / Ed. by T. Figueira, C. Soares. L.; N.Y., 2020. P. 43–71.
Forrest W.G. A History of Sparta 950–192 B.C. N.Y.; L., 1968.
Greaves A.M., Knight J.B., Rutland F. Milesian elite responses to Persia: The Ionian Revolt in context // Hermathena. 2018. No. 204–205. P. 65–138.
Green P. The Greco‐Persian Wars. Berkeley; Los Angeles; L., 1996.
Henderson J. “The Fourth Dorian Invasion” and “The Ionian Revolt” // Reading Herodotus: A Study of the Logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus’ Histories / Ed. by E. Irwin, E. Greenwood. Cambridge; N.Y., 2007. Р. 289–310.
Herodotus – The Most Homeric Historian? / Ed. by I. Matijašić // Histos. Suppl. 14. Oxford; Edmonton; Tallahassee, 2022.
How W.W., Wells J. A Commentary on Herodotus. In 2 vols. Oxford, 1912. Vol. 1. (a)
How W.W., Wells J. A Commentary on Herodotus. In 2 vols. Oxford, 1912. Vol. 2. (b)
Kulesza R. The Women of Sparta // Anabasis: Studia Classica et Orientalia. 2013. Vol. 4. P. 5−34.
Kulesza R. Sparta: History, State and Society. B. et al., 2022.
Lang M. Herodotus and the Ionian Revolt // Historia. 1968. Bd. 17. H. 1. P. 24–36.
Lupi M. Sparta and the Persian Wars, 499–478 // A Companion to Sparta / Ed. by A. Powell. Hoboken, NJ, 2018. Vol. 1. P. 271–290.
Macan R.W. Herodotus. The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Books. With Introduction, Notes, Appendices, Indices, Maps. L.; N.Y., 1895. Vol. I.1.
Manville P.B. Aristagoras and Histiaios: The Leadership Struggle in the Ionian Revolt // CQ. 1977. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 80–91.
Marincola J. Ὁμηρικώτατος? Battle Narratives in Herodotus // Herodotus – Narrator, Scientist, Historian / Ed. by E. Bowie. B.; Boston, 2018. P. 3–24.
Matijašić I. How Homeric Was Herodotus? Ancient and Modern Readers // Herodotus – The Most Homeric Historian? / Ed. by I. Matijašić // Histos. Suppl. 14. Oxford; Edmonton; Tallahassee, 2022. P. 1–37.
Millender E.G. Athenian Ideology and the Empowered Spartan Woman // Sparta: New Perspectives / Ed. by S. Hodkinson, A. Powell. Swansea; L., 1999. P. 355–391.
Millender E.G. The Spartan Dyarchy: A Comparative Perspective // Sparta: Comparative Approaches / Ed. by S. Hodkinson. Swansea, 2009. P. 1–67.
Millender E.G. Spartan Women // A Companion to Sparta / Ed. by A. Powell. Hoboken, NJ, 2018. Vol. 2. P. 500–524.
Munson R.V. The Trouble with the Ionians: Herodotus and the Beginning of the Ionian Revolt (5.28–38.1) // Reading Herodotus: A Study of the Logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus’ Histories / Ed. by E. Irwin, E. Greenwood. Cambridge; N.Y., 2007. Р. 146–167.
Murray O. The Ionian Revolt // CAH2. Vol. IV: Persia, Greece and the Western Mediterranean c. 525 to 479 B.C. / Ed. by J. Boardman, N.G.L. Hammond, D.M. Lewis, M. Ostwald. Cambridge, 1988. Р. 461–490.
Myszkowska-Kaszuba M. The Only Women that are Mothers of Men: Plutarch’s Creation of the Spartan Mother // Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2014. Vol. 19. Iss. 1. P. 77–92.
Nikolaidou-Arabatzi S. ἱστορέειν and θωμάζειν: Scientific Terms and Sings of Unity in Herodotus’ Histories // Herodotus – Narrator, Scientist, Historian / Ed. by E. Bowie. B.; Boston, 2018. P. 223–241.
Nudell J.P. Accustomed to Obedience? Classical Ionia and the Aegean World, 480–294 BCE. Ann Arbor, 2023.
Paradiso A. Gorgò, la spartana // Grecia al femminile / A cura di N. Loraux. Bari; Roma, 1993. P. 107–122.
Parker R. Cleomenes on the Acropolis. Oxford, 1998.
Peek P.S. Herodotus, Histories, Book V. Text, Commentary, and Vocabulary. Oklahoma, 2018.
Pelling C.B.R. Aristagoras (5.49–55, 97) // Reading Herodotus. A Study of the logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus’ Histories / Ed. by E.K. Irwin, E. Greenwood. Cambridge, 2007. Р. 179–201.
Phillips D.D. Spartan moicheia // The Historical Review of Sparta / Ed. by G. Piras, R. Sassu. Roma, 2022. P. 21–48.
Pomeroy S. Spartan Women. Oxford, 2002.
Powell J.E. A Lexicon to Herodotus. 2nd ed. Hildesheim, 1960.
Prontera F. Hekataios und die Erdkarte des Herodot // Gab es das griechische Wunder? Griechenland zwischen das Ende des 6. und der Mitte des 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. / Hrsg. von D. Papenfuss, V.M. Strock. Mainz, 2001. S. 127–135.
Purves A.C. Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. N.Y.; Cambridge, 2010.
Romm J. Maps // The Herodotus Encyclopedia / Ed. by C. Baron. Hoboken, NJ, 2021. Vol. 2. P. 848–849.
Romney J.M. Herodotean Geography (4.36–45): A Persian Oikoumene? // GRBS. 2017. Vol. 57. P. 862–881.
Roobaert A. Isolationnisme et impérialisme spartiates de 520 à 469 avant J.‐C. Louvain, 1985.
Ruggiero R. Erodoto, V, 49–54: esercizi di critica verbale // L’antiquité classique. 1999. T. 68. P. 23–33.
Rutherford R.B. Herodotean Ironies // Histos. Vol. 12. 2018. P. 1–48.
Scott L. Historical Commentary on Herodotus Book 6. Leiden; Boston, 2005.
Sears M.A. Brasidas and the Un-Spartan Spartan // Classical Journal. 2020. Vol. 116. No. 2. P. 173–198.
Sears M.A. Sparta and the Commemoration of War. Cambridge, 2024.
Sheehan S. A Guide to Reading Herodotus’ Histories. L. et al., 2018.
Sinitsyn А.А. Brasidas in the Megarian Operation of 424 BC in the Accounts of Thucydides and Diodorus Siculus // Anabasis: Studia Classica et Orientalia. Vol. 6. P. 50–77.
Sinitsyn А.А. The Spartan General Brasidas, the Macedonian King Perdiccas II, and Chalcidian Poleis in the Thracian Campaign of 424–423 BC: Remarks on the History of the ‘Triple Alliance’ // Studies on Ancient Sparta / Ed. by R. Kulesza, N. Sekunda. Gdańsk, 2020. Р. 207–245.
Sinitsyn A.A. τὰ ὅπλα τῶν γεφυρέων of the Persian War: Herodotus on the Banishment of the Barbarians out of Europe and the Issue of the Completeness of the First the The Histories // AAL. 2019. Vol. 65. P. 83–124.
Sinitsyn А.А., Surikov I.E. A New Collective Work on Herodotus as a Scientist and Narrator // Anabasis: Studia Classica et Orientalia. 2019. Vol. 19. S. 357–383.
Ste. Croix G.E.M.de. Athenian Democratic Origins and Other Essays / Ed. by D. Harvey, R. Parker, P. Thonemann. Oxford, 2004.
Thomas R. Herodotus, Ionia and the Athenian Empire // The World of Herodotus / Ed. by V. Karageorghis, I. Taifacos. Nicosia, 2004. P. 27–42.
Walter U. Herodot und die Ursachen des Ionischen Aufstandes // Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 1993. Bd. 42. H. 3. P. 257–278.
Waters K.H. Herodotus and the Ionian Revolt // Historia. 1970. Bd. 19. H. 4. P. 504–508.
Wells J. Studies in Herodotus. Oxford, 1923.
Welwei K.-W. Kleomenes I. und Pausanias. Zum Problem von Einzelpersönlichkeit und Polis in Sparta im späten 6. und im frühen 5. Jahrhundert v. Chr. // Herodot und die Epoche der Perserkriege: Realitäten und Fiktionen, Kolloquium zum 80. Geburtstag von Dietmar Kienast / Hrsg. von B. Bleckmann. Köln; Wien, 2007. S. 37–52.
West S. Herodotus’ Portrait of Hecataeus // JHS. 1991. Vol. 111. P. 144–160.
Zali V. Herodotus Mapping out his Genre: the Interaction of Myth and Geography in the Libyan Logos // Herodotus – Narrator, Scientist, Historian / Ed. by E. Bowie. B.; Boston, 2018. P. 125–138.